首页> 外文OA文献 >Winners and Losers of Early Elections:On the Welfare Implications of Political Blockades and Early Elections
【2h】

Winners and Losers of Early Elections:On the Welfare Implications of Political Blockades and Early Elections

机译:早期选举的赢家和输家:政治封锁和早期选举的福利影响

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

We develop a dynamic model of political competition. Each party has a policymotivated ideological wing and an office-motivated opportunistic wing. A blockade arises if inner-party conflict stops policy implementation. We use this model to study whether early elections should be used to overcome a blockade. They have the advantage that urgent decisions are no longer delayed, and the disadvantage that unsuccessful governments gain additional time in office. This may give rise to a time inconsistency. Voters are in favour of a constitution without early elections. However, in the middle of a political crisis, they are willing to abandon it.
机译:我们建立了动态​​的政治竞争模型。每个政党都有一个以政策为动力的意识形态方面和以办公室为动力的机会主义方面。如果内部冲突停止了政策的实施,就会产生封锁。我们使用这种模型来研究是否应使用提前选举来克服封锁。它们的优点是紧急决定不再被延迟,缺点是失败的政府获得了更多的任职时间。这可能会导致时间不一致。选民赞成不早日选举的宪法。但是,在政治危机中,他们愿意放弃它。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号